Using course-subject Co-occurrence (CSCO) to reveal the structure of an academic discipline: A framework to evaluate different inputs of a domain map
Peter A. Hook
School of Library and Information Science, Wayne State University, 106 Kresge Library, Detroit, MI, 48202
Search for more papers by this authorPeter A. Hook
School of Library and Information Science, Wayne State University, 106 Kresge Library, Detroit, MI, 48202
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This article proposes, exemplifies, and validates the use of course-subject co-occurrence (CSCO) data to generate topic maps of an academic discipline. A CSCO event is when 2 course-subjects are taught in the same academic year by the same teacher. A total of 61,856 CSCO events were extracted from the 2010–11 directory of the American Association of Law Schools and used to visualize the structure of law school education in the United States. Different normalization, ordination (layout), and clustering algorithms were compared and the best performing algorithm of each type was used to generate the final map. Validation studies demonstrate that CSCO produces topic maps that are consistent with expert opinion and 4 other indicators of the topical similarity of law school course-subjects. This research is the first to use CSCO to produce a visualization of a domain. It is also the first to use an expanded, multi-part gold standard to evaluate the validity of domain maps and the intermediate steps in their creation. It is suggested that the framework used herein may be adopted for other studies that compare different inputs of a domain map in order to empirically derive the best maps as measured against extrinsic sources of topical similarity (gold standards).
References
- AALS. (1931). Directory of Teachers in Member Schools: 1931. Saint Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Co.
- AALS. (2010). AALS Directory of Law Teachers: 2010–2011. Saint Paul, Minnesota: Thomson West.
- AALS. (2011). The AALS Directory of Law Teachers 2011–2012. Washington, DC: AALS.
- ABA & LSAC. (2012). ABA-LSAC Official Guide to ABA-approved Law Schools ( 2013th edn). Newtown, Pennsylvania: LSAC.
- Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek: A program for large network analysis. Connections, 21(2), 47–57.
- Biglan, A. (1973). Characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203.
- Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, Massachusetts: Analytic Technologies.
- Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351–374.
- Bryant, F.B., & Yarnold, P.R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L.G. Grimm & P.R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics (pp. 99–136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Cattell, R.B. (1966). The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis. In R.B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology (pp. 174–243). Chicago: Rand McNally.
- Clinton, J., & Meirowitz, A. (2001). Agenda constrained legislator ideal points and the spatial voting model. Political Analysis, 9(3), 242–259.
10.1093/polana/9.3.242 Google Scholar
- Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370.
- Commaneur, J.J.F., & Heiser, W.J. (1993). Mathematical Derivations in the Proximity Scaling (PROXSCAL) of Symmetric Data Matrices (p. 73). Leiden: Department of Data Theory, University of Leiden.
- De Solla Price, D.J., & Beaver, D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21(11), 1011–1018.
- Doyle, L.B. (1961). Semantic road maps for literature searchers. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 8(4), 553–578.
10.1145/321088.321095 Google Scholar
- Doyle, L.B. (1962). Indexing and abstracting by association. American Documentation, 13(4), 378–390.
- Fortunato, S. (2010). Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 486(3–5), 75–174.
- Fruchterman, T.M.J., & Reingold, E.M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software, Practice and Experience, 21(11), 1129–1164.
- Greenfield, P.M. (1984). A Theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday Cognition: Its Development in Social Context (pp. 117–138). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Harman, H.H. (1976). Modern Factor Analysis ( 3rd ed., rev. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Hook, P.A. (2007a). The aggregate harmony metric and a statistical and visual contextualization of the Rehnquist Court: 50 years of data. Constitutional Commentary, 24(1), 221–264.
- Hook, P.A. (2007b). Visualizing the topic space of the United States Supreme Court. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
- Hook, P.A. (2014a). Evaluating the work of judges. In B. Cronin & C.R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact (pp. 345–364). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
- Hook, P.A. (2014b). The structure and evolution of the academic discipline of law in the United States: Generation and validation of course-subject co-occurrence maps. Doctoral Dissertation. Indiana University School of Informatics and Computing. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/slisfrp/125/
- IBM Corp. (2010). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 19.0). Armonk, New York: IBM Corp.
- IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 21.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
- Jackman, S. (2001). Multidimensional analysis of roll call data via bayesian simulation: Identification, estimation, inference, and model checking. Political Analysis, 9(3), 227–241.
10.1093/polana/9.3.227 Google Scholar
- Jackson, D.W., & Gee, E.G. (1975). Bread and Butter?: Electives in American Legal Education. New York: Council on Legal Education for Professional Responsibility.
- Kaiser, H.F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151.
- Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1), 7–15.
- Kennedy, D. (1983). The political significance of the structure of the law school curriculum. Seton Hall Law Review, 14(1), 1–16.
- Kessler, M.M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25.
- Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (2006). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 251–263.
- Kruskal, J.B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional Scaling. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications.
10.4135/9781412985130 Google Scholar
- Lawler, E.L. (1963). Quadratic assignment problem. Management Science, 9(4), 586–599.
- Lenk, P. (1983). Mappings of fields based on nominations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(2), 115–122.
- Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362.
- MacEachren, A.M. (2004). How Maps Work: Representation, Visualization, and Design ( 2004 paperback ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
- Marshakova, I.V. (1973). System of document connections vased on references. Scientific and Technical Information Serial of VINITI, 6, 3–8.
- McCain, K.W. (1985). Longitudinal Cocited Author Mapping and Intellectual Structure: A Test of Congruence in Two Scientific Literatures. Doctoral Dissertation. Drexel University.
- McCain, K.W. (1993). Visible Colleges: The Special Interest Group Co-Membership Structure of ASIS. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 56th ASIS Annual Meeting, Columbus, Ohio.
- Montello, D.R., Fabrikant, S.I., Ruocco, M., & Middleton, R.S. (2003). Testing the first law of cognitive geography on point-display spatializations. In W. Kuhn, M.F. Worboys, & S. Timpf (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory: Foundations of Geographic Information Science: Proceedings of the Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT '03): Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2825 (pp. 316–331). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
10.1007/978-3-540-39923-0_21 Google Scholar
- Moody, J., & Mucha, P.J. (2013). Portrait of political party polarization. Network Science, 1(1), 119–121.
10.1017/nws.2012.3 Google Scholar
- Pitofsky, R., Goldschmid, H.J., & Wood, D.P. (2010). Trade Regulation: Cases and Materials ( 6th ed.). New York: Foundation Press/Thomson Reuters.
- Poole, K.T., & Rosenthal, H. (1985). A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 357–384.
- Price, N., & Schiminovich, S. (1968). A clustering experiment: First step towards a computer-generated classification scheme. Information Storage and Retrieval, 4, 271–280.
- Pritchett, C.H. (1941). Divisions of opinion among justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, 1939–1941. The American Political Science Review, 35(5), 890–898.
10.2307/1948251 Google Scholar
- Pritchett, C.H. (1942). The voting behavior of the Supreme Court, 1941–42. The Journal of Politics, 4(4), 491–506.
10.2307/2125654 Google Scholar
- Pritchett, C.H. (1948). The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values 1937–1947. New York: Macmillan Co.
- Pritchett, C.H. (1954). Civil Liberties and the Vinson Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Schubert, G. (1962). The 1960 term of the Supreme Court: A psychological analysis. The American Political Science Review, 56(1), 90–107.
- Schubert, G. (1963). Judicial attitudes and voting behavior: The 1961 term of the United States Supreme Court. Law and Contemporary Problems, 28(1), 100–142.
- Sirovich, L. (2003). A pattern analysis of the second Rehnquist U.S. Supreme Court. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(13), 7432–7437.
- Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS), 24(4), 265–269.
- Spasser, M.A. (1997). Mapping the terrain of pharmacy: Co-classification analysis of the international pharmaceutical abstracts database. Scientometrics, 39(1), 77–97.
- Stevens, R. (1983). Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the 1980s. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press.
- Thurstone, L.L., & Degan, J.W. (1951). A factorial study of the Supreme Court. PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America), 37(9), 628–635.
- Todorov, R. (1989). Co-classification analysis for science mapping: An example from superconductivity. In A.F.J. Van Rann, A.J. Nederhof, & H.F. Moed (Eds.), Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 263–270). Leiden: DSWO Pr., University of Leiden.
- Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635–1651.
- Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
- White, H.D., & Calhoun, K. (1984). Mapping a curriculum by computer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35(2), 82–89.
- White, H.D., & Nolt, C. (1987). Remapping a curriculum by computer: Change over time. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 28(2), 123–135.
- Wolotira, A.L. (2012). From a trickle to a flood: A case study of the Current Index to Legal Periodicals to examine the swell of American law journals published in the last fifty years. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 31(2), 150–183.
10.1080/0270319X.2012.682930 Google Scholar
- Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. (1976). Role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.
- Zitt, M., Lelu, A., & Bassecoulard, E. (2011). Hybrid citation-word representations in science mapping: Portolan charts of research fields? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 19–39.