Materiality in information environments: Objects, spaces, and bodies in three outpatient hemodialysis facilities
Corresponding Author
Tiffany C. Veinot
School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCasey S. Pierce
School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Tiffany C. Veinot
School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCasey S. Pierce
School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The materiality of information environments, and its role in information behavior, has received little attention. We present an ethnographic study involving 156 hours of observation and 28 patient interviews in outpatient hemodialysis facilities. Using an extended “Semiotic Framework for Information Systems Research,” the findings show that objects, spaces, and bodies were integral to 6 sociomaterial layers of facility information environments: the physical, empiric, syntactic, semantic, pragmatic, and social world. Objects of importance in the information environments included dialysis machines, instruments, records, paper documents, televisions, furniture, thermostats, lighting, and personal possessions. Spatial features, including compartmentalization, displays, distance, proximity, and spatially-grounded routines, also constituted information environments. The information environments were also shaped by patient immobility, bodily discomforts, and orientation to bodily states. Each sociomaterial layer introduced enablers and constraints to information access, flow, and acceptance; these combined to construct patients primarily as passive recipients of information rather than active seekers and producers of information. A sociomaterial perspective and related focus on objects, spaces, and bodies offers a lens for professional information practice. We contribute information environment design guidance to facilitate such practice and stress that the value of certain sources and types of information can be materially encoded in an environment.
References
- acceptance, n. (2011). Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Agada, J. (1999). Inner-city gatekeepers: An exploratory survey of their information use environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(1), 74–85.
- Bates, J. (2018). The politics of data friction. Journal of Documentation, 74(2), 412–429.
- Blanchette, J.-F. (2011). A material history of bits. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1042–1057.
- Boell, S., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2011). Theorizing information–From signs to sociomaterial practices. Paper presented at the 22nd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, Australia.
- Boell, S.K. & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2010). Attributes of information. Paper presented at the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Lima, Peru.
- Bonner, A., & Lloyd, A. (2011). What information counts at the moment of practice? Information practices of renal nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(6), 1213–1221.
- Brandt, A.M., & Sloane, D.C. (1999). Of beds and benches: Building the modern hospital. In P. Galison & E.A. Thompson (Eds.), The architecture of science (pp. 281–308). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Buckland, M.K. (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 351–360.
- Buschman, J., & Leckie, G.J. (2007). The library as place: history, community, and culture. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
- Carlile, P.R. (2013). How matter matters: Objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Chatman, E.A. (1996). The impoverished life-world of outsiders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(3), 193–206.
- Chatman, E.A. (1999). A theory of life in the round. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 207–217.
- Cohen, S., Evans, G.W., Stokols, D., & Krantz, D.S. (2013). Behavior, health, and environmental stress. New York: Springer.
- Courtright, C. (2007). Context in information behavior research. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 273–306.
- Cox, A.M. (2018). Embodied knowledge and sensory information: Theoretical roots and inspirations. Library Trends, 66(3), 223–238.
- DeWalt, K.M., & DeWalt, B.R. (2002). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
- Durugbo, C., Tiwari, A., & Alcock, J.R. (2013). Modelling information flow for organisations: A review of approaches and future challenges. International Journal of Information Management, 33(3), 597–610.
- Elbanna, A. (2016). Doing sociomateriality research in information systems. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 47(4), 84–92.
- Fiedler, K. (2007). Information ecology and the explanation of social cognition and behavior. In A.W. Kruglanski & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: handbook of basic principles (pp. 176–200). New York: Guilford Press.
- Fisher, K.E. (2005). Information grounds. In K.E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & L. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information behavior (pp. 185–190). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
- Fisher, K.E. (2006). Social spaces, casual interactions, meaningful exchanges: 'Information ground' characteristics based on the college student experience. Information Research, 12(2), 3.
- Frohmann, B. (2007). Multiplicity, materiality, and autonomous agency of documentation. In R. Skare, N.W. Lund, & A. Vårheim (Eds.), A document (re) turn: Contributions for a research field in transition (pp. 27–39). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
- Given, L.M. (2007). Setting the stage for undergraduates' information behaviors: Faculty and librarians' perspectives on academic space. In J. Buschman & G.J. Leckie (Eds.), The library as place: history, community, and culture (pp. 177–189). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
- Godbold, N. (2013). Listening to bodies and watching machines: Developing health information skills, tools and services for people living with chronic kidney disease. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 44(1), 14–28.
- Haider, J., & Sundin, O. (2014). The materiality of encyclopedic information: Remediating a loved one — Mourning britannica. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Seattle, Washington, 51(1), 1–10.
- Hesse-Biber, S.N. (2006). Chapter 4: In-depth interview. In S.N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), The practice of qualitative research (pp. 119–148). Los Angeles: Sage.
- Hine, C. (2007). Multi-sited ethnography as a middle range methodology for contemporary STS. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 32(6), 652–671.
- Hua, Y., Loftness, V., Heerwagen, J.H., & Powell, K.M. (2011). Relationship between workplace spatial settings and occupant-perceived support for collaboration. Environment and Behavior, 43(6), 807–826.
- Hull, M.S. (2012). Documents and bureaucracy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 251–267.
- Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456.
- Huvila, I. (2016). Awkwardness of becoming a boundary object: Mangle and materialities of reports, documentation data, and the archaeological work. Information Society, 32(4), 280–297.
- Huvila, I., Anderson, T.D., Jansen, E.H., McKenzie, P., & Worrall, A. (2017). Boundary objects in information science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(8), 1807–1822.
- Jaeger, P.T., & Burnett, G. (2010). Information worlds: Social context, technology, and information behavior in the age of the Internet. New York: Routledge.
- Jaeger, P.T., Burnett, G., & Thompson, K. (2016). Normative behavior and information. Library & Information Science Research, 30(1), 56–66.
- Jarrahi, M.H., & Nelson, S.B. (2018). Agency, sociomateriality, and configuration work. Information Society, 34(4), 244–260.
- Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
- Latour, B. (2004). Nonhumans. In S. Harrison, S. Pile, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Patterned ground: Entanglements of nature and culture (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Lee, M., & Butler, B.S. (2019). How are information deserts created? A theory of local information landscapes. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(2), 101–116.
- Leonardi, P.M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them? In P.M. Leonardi, B.A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 25–48). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Lievrouw, L.A. (2001). New media and the 'pluralization of life-worlds': A role for information in social differentiation. New Media & Society, 3(1), 7–28.
- Mason, J.O., Khunti, K., Stone, M., Farooqi, A., & Carr, S. (2008). Educational interventions in kidney disease care: a systematic review of randomized trials. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 51(6), 933–951.
- McCreadie, M., & Rice, R.E. (1999). Trends in analyzing access to information. Part I: Cross-disciplinary conceptualizations of access. Information Processing & Management, 35(1), 45–76.
- McCullough, M. (2013). Ambient commons: Attention in the age of embodied information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Metoyer-Duran, C. (1993). Information gatekeepers. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 28, 111–150.
- Meyer, S.R., Pierce, C.S., Kou, Y., Leonardi, P.M., Nardi, B.A., & Bailey, D.E. (2015). Offshoring digital work, but not physical output: Differential access to task objects and coordination in globally distributed automotive engineering and graphic design work. Paper presented at the 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
- Miwa, Y., & Hanyu, K. (2006). The effects of interior design on communication and impressions of a counselor in a counseling room. Environment and Behavior, 38(4), 484–502.
- Mueller, B., Raeth, P., Faraj, S., Kautz, K., Robey, D., & Schultze, U. (2012). On the methodological and philosophical challenges of sociomaterial theorizing: an overview of competing conceptualizations. Paper presented at the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Orlando, FL.
- National Library of Medicine. (2013). Retrieved from https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?ui=D022126
- Nöth, W. (1990). Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
- Okken, V., van Rompay, T., & Pruyn, A. (2012). Exploring space in the consultation room: Environmental influences during patient-physician interaction. Journal of Health Communication, 17(4), 397–412.
- Olsson, M., & Lloyd, A. (2017). Being in place: Embodied information practices. Information Research, 22(1).
- Orlikowski, W.J., & Scott, S.V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.
- Pentland, B.T., & Singh, H. (2012). Materiality: What are the consequences? In P.M. Leonardi, B.A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 287–295). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Rajkomar, A., Mayer, A., & Blandford, A. (2015). Understanding safety-critical interactions with a home medical device through distributed cognition. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 56, 179–194.
- Robertson, C. (2014). “You lie!” identity, paper, and the materiality of information. The Communication Review, 17(2), 69–90.
- Saldaña, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles: Sage.
- Savolainen, R. (2009). Small world and information grounds as contexts of information seeking and sharing. Library & Information Science Research, 31(1), 38–45.
- Schensul, J.J., & LeCompte, M.D. (2013). Chapter 10: Sampling in ethnographic research. In Essential ethnographic methods: A mixed methods approach (pp. 280–318). Lanham, MD: AltaMira.
- Shankar, K., Hakken, D., & Østerlund, C. (2017). Rethinking documents. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C.A. Miller, & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 59–85). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Soderholm, J., & Nolin, J. (2015). Collections redux: The public library as a place of community borrowing. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 85(3), 244–260.
- Stamper, R. (1991). The semiotic framework for information systems research. In Information systems research: Contemporary approaches and emergent traditions (pp. 515–528). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
- Sundin, O., & Carlsson, H. (2016). Outsourcing trust to the information infrastructure in schools: How search engines order knowledge in education practices. Journal of Documentation, 72(6), 990–1007.
- Talja, S., Tuominen, K., & Savolainen, R. (2005). "Isms" in information science: Constructivism, collectivism and constructionism. Journal of Documentation, 61(1), 79–101.
- Taylor, R.S. (1991). Information use environments. In B. Dervin & M.J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences (pp. 217–255). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Ulrich, R.S., Zimring, C., Zhu, X., DuBose, J., Seo, H.-B., Choi, Y.-S., … Joseph, A. (2008). A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 1(3), 61–125.
- Veinot, T.C. (2007). “The eyes of the power company”: Workplace information practices of a vault inspector. Library Quarterly, 77(2), 157–180.
- Veinot, T.C. (2009). Interactive acquisition and sharing: Understanding the dynamics of HIV/AIDS information networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2313–2332.
- Veinot, T.C. (2010). “We have a lot of information to share with each other”: Understanding the value of peer-based health information exchange. Information Research, 15(4), 452.
- Veinot, T.C. (2013). Regional HIV/AIDS information environments and information acquisition success. The Information Society, 29(2), 88–112.
- Veinot, T.C., Meadowbrooke, C.C., Loveluck, J., Hickok, A., & Bauermeister, J.A. (2013). How "community" matters for how people interact with information: Mixed methods study of young men who have sex with other men. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(2), e33.
- Veinot, T.C., Meadowbrooke, C.C., Newman, M.W., Zheng, K., & Perry, E.E. (2010). Routines that ease the pain: The information world of a dialysis clinic. Paper presented at the American Society for Information Science & Technology (ASIS&T) Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
- Veinot, T.C., & Williams, K. (2012). Following the “community” thread from sociology to information behavior and informatics: Uncovering theoretical continuities and research opportunities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5), 847–864.
- Williamson, K. (2005). Ecological theory of human information behaviour. In K.E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & L. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of Information Behavior: A researcher's guide (pp. 128–132). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
- Wilson, T.D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49–56.
- Wolf, C.T., & Veinot, T.C. (2014). Struggling for space and finding my place: An interactionist perspective on everyday use of biomedical information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 66(2), 282–296.