Revisiting “the 1990s debutante”: Scholar-led publishing and the prehistory of the open access movement
Corresponding Author
Samuel A. Moore
Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London, London, UK
Correspondence
Samuel A. Moore, Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London, London, UK.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Samuel A. Moore
Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London, London, UK
Correspondence
Samuel A. Moore, Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London, London, UK.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The movement for open access publishing (OA) is often said to have its roots in the scientific disciplines, having been popularized by scientific publishers and formalized through a range of top-down policy interventions. But there is an often-neglected prehistory of OA that can be found in the early DIY publishers of the late 1980s and early 1990s. Managed entirely by working academics, these journals published research in the humanities and social sciences and stand out for their unique set of motivations and practices. This article explores this separate lineage in the history of the OA movement through a critical-theoretical analysis of the motivations and practices of the early scholar-led publishers. Alongside showing the involvement of the humanities and social sciences in the formation of OA, the analysis reveals the importance that these journals placed on experimental practices, critique of commercial publishing, and the desire to reach new audiences. Understood in today's context, this research is significant for adding complexity to the history of OA, which policymakers, advocates, and publishing scholars should keep in mind as OA goes mainstream.
REFERENCES
- Acker, K. (1990). Dead doll humility. Postmodern Culture, 1(1). Retrieved from http://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/text-only/issue.990/acker.990
10.1353/pmc.1990.0001 Google Scholar
- Adema, J. (2014). Open access. Retrieved from https://meson.press/keywords/
- Adema, J., Stone, G., & Keene, C. (2017). Changing publishing ecologies: A landscape study of new university presses and academic-led publishing. Retrieved from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6666/1/Changing-publishing-ecologies-report.pdf
- Adema, J., & Moore, S.A. (2017). The radical open access collective: Building alliances for a progressive, scholar-led commons. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/10/27/the-radical-open-access-collective-building-alliances-for-a-progressive-scholar-led-commons/
- AmeliCA. (n.d.). About AmeliCA. Retrieved from http://www.amelica.org/en/index.php/que-es-ameli/
- Amiran, E. (1996). The rhetoric of serials at the present time. The Serials Librarian, 28(3–4), 209–221.
10.1300/J123v28n03_03 Google Scholar
- Amiran, E., Orr, E. N., & Unsworth, J. M. (1990). Postface: Positions on postmodernism. Postmodern Culture, 1(1), 1. Retrieved from http://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/text-only/issue.990/postface.990
- Amiran, E., & Unsworth, J. (1991). Postmodern culture: Publishing in the electronic medium. The Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 2(1). Retrieved from https://journals.tdl.org/pacsr/index.php/pacsr/article/view/6025
- Bailey, C. W., Jr. (1990a). Libraries with glass walls. Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 1(2), 1. Retrieved from https://journals.tdl.org/pacsr/index.php/pacsr/article/view/5961/5593
- Bailey Jr., C.W. (1990b). Editorial. Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 1(1).
- Bilder, G., Lin, J., & Neylon, C. (2015). Principles for Open Scholarly Infrastructures. Retrieved from http://cameronneylon.net/blog/principles-for-open-scholarly-infrastructures/
- BOAI. (2002). Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
- cOAlition S. (2018). “Plan S” and “cOAlition S”—Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications. Retrieved from https://www.coalition-s.org/
- Crawford, W. (2019). Gold Open Access 2013–2018: Articles in journals. Retrieved from https://waltcrawford.name/goa4.pdf
- Else, H. (2018). Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions. Nature, 561, 17–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06178-7
- Eve, M. P. (2014). Open access and the humanities: Contexts, controversies and the future. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781316161012 Google Scholar
- Fyfe, A. (2017). 1963: The Royal Society Publishing Code. Retrieved from https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/philosophicaltransactions/the-royal-society-publishing-code-from-1963/
- Gaind, N. (2019). Huge US university cancels subscription with Elsevier. Nature, 567, 15–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00758-x
- Geere, D. (2011). The history of Creative Commons. Wired UK. Retrieved from https://www.wired.co.uk/article/history-of-creative-commons
- Ginsparg, P. (2009). The global village pioneers. Learned Publishing, 22(2), 95–100.
- Guédon, J.-C. (1994). Why are electronic publications difficult to classify? In Directory of electronic journals, newsletters and academic discussion lists ( 4th ed.) University of Glasgow. Retrieved from http://www.people.virginia.edu/~pm9k/libsci/guedon.html
- Guédon, J.-C. (1996a). Research libraries and electronic scholarly journals: Challenges or opportunities? The Serials Librarian, 26(3–4), 1–20.
10.1300/J123v26n03_01 Google Scholar
- Guédon, J.-C. (1996b). The seminar, the encyclopedia, and the eco-museum as possible future forms of scholarly publishing. In R. P. Peek & G. B. Newby (Eds.), Scholarly publishing: The electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Guédon, J.-C. (2017). Open Access: Toward the Internet of the Mind. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai15/Untitleddocument.docx
- Harnad, S. (1990). Scholarly skywriting and the prepublication continuum of scientific inquiry. Psychological Science, 1, 342–343.
- hooks, b. (1990). Postmodern blackness. Postmodern Culture, 1(1), 1 Retrieved from http://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/text-only/issue.990/hooks.990
- Kelty, C. M. (2008). Two bits: The cultural significance of free software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
10.1215/9780822389002 Google Scholar
- Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS One, 10(6), e0127502.
- Lebert, M. (2009). A short history of EBooks. Project Gutenberg.
- Lewis, D. W., Goetsch, L., Graves, D., & Roy, M. (2018). Funding community controlled open infrastructure for scholarly communication: The 2.5% commitment initiative. College & Research Libraries News, 79(3), 133.
10.5860/crln.79.3.133 Google Scholar
- Mandler, P. (2014). Open access: A perspective from the humanities. Insights, 27(2), 166–170. Retrieved from http://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/2048-7754.89/?toggle_hypothesis=on.
10.1629/2048-7754.89 Google Scholar
- Maxwell, J. W., Bordini, A., & Shamash, K. (2017). Reassembling scholarly communications: An evaluation of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation's monograph initiative (final report, may 2016). Journal of Electronic Publishing, 20(1). Retrieved from https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0020.101?view=text;rgn=main
- Moore, S. A. (2017). A genealogy of open access: Negotiations between openness and access to research. Revue Française des Sciences de l'information et de La Communication, (11).
- Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism ( 1st ed.). New York: PublicAffairs.
- O'Donnell, J. J. (1996). Five years of Bryn Mawr classical review. The Serials Librarian, 28(3–4), 8.
10.1300/J123v28n03_04 Google Scholar
- Okerson, A. (1992). Publishing through the network: The 1990s debutante. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 23(3), 170–177.
10.3138/JSP-023-03-170 Google Scholar
- Open Access Directory. (n.d.). Timeline before 2000. Retrieved from http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Timeline_before_2000
- OpenAPC. (n.d.). OpenAPC - Open APC. Retrieved from OpenAPC website: https://treemaps.intact-project.org/apcdata/openapc/#publisher/
- Pinfield, S., Salter, J., & Bath, P. A. (2016). The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open-access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(7), 1751–1766.
- Readings, B. (1994). Caught in the net. Surfaces, 4.
- ScholarLed. (2018). Overview. Retrieved from https://scholarled.org/#overview
- Sciolino, M. (1990). Kathy Acker and the postmodern subject of feminism. College English, 52(4), 437.
- Severin, A., Egger, M., Eve, M. P., & Hürlimann, D. (2018). Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: An evidence-based review. F1000Research, 7, 1925.
- Suber, P. (2012). Open access. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/9286.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Tkacz, N. (2014). Wikipedia and the politics of openness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226192444.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Unsworth, J.M. (n.d.). Postmodern culture. Retrieved from http://people.virginia.edu/~jmu2m//pmc.html
- van Leeuwen, T. N., Tatum, C., & Wouters, P. F. (2018). Exploring possibilities to use bibliometric data to monitor gold open access publishing at the national level. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(9), 1161–1173.
- Willinsky, J. (2005). The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science. First Monday, 10(8), 10. Retrieved from http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1265
10.5210/fm.v10i8.1265 Google Scholar
- Yu, H., & Breivold, S. (2008). Electronic resource management in libraries: Research and practice. London, New York: Information Science Reference.
10.4018/978-1-59904-891-8 Google Scholar